Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 18, 2024, 9:52 am

Thread Rating:
  • 7 Vote(s) - 1.57 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 11, 2015 at 3:44 pm)IATIA Wrote: Even your bible makes reference to Zeus, Therefore Zeus is real.  Why do you not believe in Zeus?

(July 11, 2015 at 5:12 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: I've made a mental note to address this question. It's not one that scholars take seriously, but this crowd seems to think it's a big deal, so I will eventually get around to it.

In fact, the bible references 34 gods. That should get you hopping a bit. Big Grin
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson

God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers

Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders

Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 11, 2015 at 5:37 pm)Neimenovic Wrote:
(July 10, 2015 at 9:12 am)Just Yesterday Randy Carson Wrote: If God were to make a more overt gesture of His existence, He would interfere with our free will.

It's just that simple.

Quote:However, my position (if anyone should ask) is that God HAS revealed Himself dramatically to some people AND they still had free will and the ability to choose how they would respond. Moses could have seen the burning bush, and run the other way. Mary could have said, "No."

You're a fucking liar.

I'm not sure how you conclude that I'm a liar from this. I think that if God WERE to go BIG on the revelation thing, it would be coercive in the sense that we really wouldn't have any choice but to go along with the program. For this reason, God has revealed himself in some dramatic ways to some people so that they would know that they WERE dealing with God, but without denying them the right to say no. Most obviously, since He is God, He would be in a position to only approach people that He knew would respond positively. Like Mary, for example. I doubt she was chosen purely at random, do you?

Jonah resisted God at first, but in the end, he accepted God's will. Did God violate Jonah's free will? Or did God simply know that Jonah needed more "nudging"? This is a big subject...one I am not really qualified to dwell on. But it seems to me that God knows whose hearts are ultimately open to Him and whose are permanently hardened by their own decisions and will.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 11, 2015 at 5:50 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:
(July 11, 2015 at 5:37 pm)Neimenovic Wrote: You're a fucking liar.

I'm not sure how you conclude that I'm a liar from this. I think that if God WERE to go BIG on the revelation thing, it would be coercive in the sense that we really wouldn't have any choice but to go along with the program. For this reason, God has revealed himself in some dramatic ways to some people so that they would know that they WERE dealing with God, but without denying them the right to say no. Most obviously, since He is God, He would be in a position to only approach people that He knew would respond positively. Like Mary, for example. I doubt she was chosen purely at random, do you?

Jonah resisted God at first, but in the end, he accepted God's will. Did God violate Jonah's free will? Or did God simply know that Jonah needed more "nudging"? This is a big subject...one I am not really qualified to dwell on. But it seems to me that God knows whose hearts are ultimately open to Him and whose are permanently hardened by their own decisions and will.

God was "nudging" Jonah in the story?     ROFLOL   Fuck, my ribs!  Why didn't you tell us you did stand-up?
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 11, 2015 at 5:50 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: I'm not sure how you conclude that I'm a liar from this. I think that if God WERE to go BIG on the revelation thing, it would be coercive in the sense that we really wouldn't have any choice but to go along with the program. For this reason, God has revealed himself in some dramatic ways to some people so that they would know that they WERE dealing with God, but without denying them the right to say no. Most obviously, since He is God, He would be in a position to only approach people that He knew would respond positively. Like Mary, for example. I doubt she was chosen purely at random, do you?

First you say that god can't reveal himself to people because that violates free will.

Now you say god can reveal himself and it doesn't violate our free will.

And you're asking why I conclude you're a liar?

Mary was instructed, not asked. Look up the passage. And do you really think 'I will impregnate you with myself' isn't 'going big on the revelation thing'?

Bah. Your god should seek a better lawyer. You're embarrassing him.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 11, 2015 at 5:28 pm)Neimenovic Wrote:
(July 11, 2015 at 5:23 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: The fact is that proving the existence of Jesus the man says nothing at all about the deity. This entire argument is based on a non sequitur.

NOTHING Randy is trying to prove here does anything for his deity. Fuck, Jesus could've existed, performed miracles AND risen from the dead for all I care, and that still wouldn't prove any fucker named Yahweh to exist.

Jesus spoke of this attitude...

The Rich Man and Lazarus

19 “There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day. 20 At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores 21 and longing to eat what fell from the rich man’s table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores.

22 “The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham’s side. The rich man also died and was buried. 23 In Hades, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side. 24 So he called to him, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.’

25 “But Abraham replied, ‘Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. 26 And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been set in place, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.’

27 “He answered, ‘Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my family, 28 for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.’

29 “Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.’

30 “‘No, father Abraham,’ he said, ‘but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.’

31 “He said to him, If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.’”
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 11, 2015 at 5:54 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:
(July 11, 2015 at 5:50 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: I'm not sure how you conclude that I'm a liar from this. I think that if God WERE to go BIG on the revelation thing, it would be coercive in the sense that we really wouldn't have any choice but to go along with the program. For this reason, God has revealed himself in some dramatic ways to some people so that they would know that they WERE dealing with God, but without denying them the right to say no. Most obviously, since He is God, He would be in a position to only approach people that He knew would respond positively. Like Mary, for example. I doubt she was chosen purely at random, do you?

Jonah resisted God at first, but in the end, he accepted God's will. Did God violate Jonah's free will? Or did God simply know that Jonah needed more "nudging"? This is a big subject...one I am not really qualified to dwell on. But it seems to me that God knows whose hearts are ultimately open to Him and whose are permanently hardened by their own decisions and will.

God was "nudging" Jonah in the story? 

The " " marks should have given you some clue that I was using the word for dramatic effect. [Image: thumbsup.gif]
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Thanks, Captain Obvious.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 11, 2015 at 6:01 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:
(July 11, 2015 at 5:28 pm)Neimenovic Wrote: NOTHING Randy is trying to prove here does anything for his deity. Fuck, Jesus could've existed, performed miracles AND risen from the dead for all I care, and that still wouldn't prove any fucker named Yahweh to exist.

Jesus spoke of this attitude...

Alright, rev. Carson.

Please explain how someone rising from the dead proves Yahweh to exist.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 11, 2015 at 5:28 pm)Neimenovic Wrote: Fuck, Jesus could've existed, performed miracles AND risen from the dead for all I care, and that still wouldn't prove any fucker named Yahweh to exist.

But the bible says so. Worship
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson

God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers

Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders

Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 11, 2015 at 5:56 pm)Neimenovic Wrote:
(July 11, 2015 at 5:50 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: I'm not sure how you conclude that I'm a liar from this. I think that if God WERE to go BIG on the revelation thing, it would be coercive in the sense that we really wouldn't have any choice but to go along with the program. For this reason, God has revealed himself in some dramatic ways to some people so that they would know that they WERE dealing with God, but without denying them the right to say no. Most obviously, since He is God, He would be in a position to only approach people that He knew would respond positively. Like Mary, for example. I doubt she was chosen purely at random, do you?

First you say that god can't reveal himself to people because that violates free will.

No, I didn't say that God "can't reveal himself". In the passage that you just quoted, I said, "If God were to make a more overt gesture of His existence, He would interfere with our free will."

"More overt" does not mean "can't".

Quote:Now you say god can reveal himself and it doesn't violate our free will.

And you're asking why I conclude you're a liar?

Well, I guess you concluded that I'm lying because you're not really paying attention.

Quote:Mary was instructed, not asked. Look up the passage. And do you really think 'I will impregnate you with myself' isn't 'going big on the revelation thing'?

Mary was informed - not commanded, and she consented to God's plan just as He in His foreknowledge knew she would. “I am the Lord’s servant,” Mary answered. “May your word to me be fulfilled.”
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proving evolution? LinuxGal 24 3583 March 19, 2023 at 10:36 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  What will win the god wars? Faith, Fantasy, Facts, or God? Greatest I am 98 9422 December 28, 2020 at 12:01 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 20879 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Travis Walton versus The Resurrection. Jehanne 61 17902 November 29, 2017 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Why do Christians believe in the Resurrection of Jesus but not alien abductions? Jehanne 72 13411 June 27, 2016 at 1:54 am
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  We can be certain of NO resurrection - A Response Randy Carson 136 42144 October 2, 2015 at 4:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach BrianSoddingBoru4 160 29880 July 5, 2015 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  Obama and the simulated resurrection professor 116 20825 April 25, 2015 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) His_Majesty 1617 389974 January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum) YahwehIsTheWay 32 7873 December 11, 2014 at 4:58 pm
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 25 Guest(s)