Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 19, 2018 at 11:02 pm
(August 19, 2018 at 10:58 pm)Succubus Wrote: (August 19, 2018 at 10:46 pm)Shell B Wrote: There isn’t an issue to mediate here.
If Cyberman is the disgusting bastard he's portrayed here then I must disagree.
It was dealt with a long time ago. Disagree all you want, we’re not discussing taking staff action here. We’re just having a conversation. I don’t see why it matters to you. This is odd.
Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 19, 2018 at 11:04 pm
(August 19, 2018 at 10:50 pm)Joods Wrote: Clearly succubus thinks he knows how to run this place better than, you know, those actually running the place.
Lots of people do. Some of them might be right.
Posts: 2435
Threads: 21
Joined: May 5, 2017
Reputation:
26
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 19, 2018 at 11:05 pm
(August 19, 2018 at 10:58 pm)Tiberius Wrote: (August 19, 2018 at 10:55 pm)Succubus Wrote: And yet without him breaking the sites rules some forum members were concerned enough that they reported him to plod?
Wouldn't an efficient moderating team delete the problem before it developed that far?
We reported him to the police the same time we removed him. We weren’t aware of the problem until his behavior was reported, so unless you have a suggestion on reading minds over the Internet or predicting the future, I’m not sure how more efficient we could have been.
Removed him? Removed him from where? If his mind state was such that he created such concern among other members then he should have been banned without a second thought.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.
Posts: 18544
Threads: 145
Joined: March 18, 2015
Reputation:
100
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 19, 2018 at 11:07 pm
(August 19, 2018 at 11:04 pm)Shell B Wrote: (August 19, 2018 at 10:50 pm)Joods Wrote: Clearly succubus thinks he knows how to run this place better than, you know, those actually running the place.
Lots of people do. Some of them might be right.
I don't think he's one of them. This place was running just fine before he came along and I'm sure it'll run just fine after he's gone.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work. If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now. Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 19, 2018 at 11:08 pm
(August 19, 2018 at 11:05 pm)Succubus Wrote: (August 19, 2018 at 10:58 pm)Tiberius Wrote: We reported him to the police the same time we removed him. We weren’t aware of the problem until his behavior was reported, so unless you have a suggestion on reading minds over the Internet or predicting the future, I’m not sure how more efficient we could have been.
Removed him? Removed him from where? If his mind state was such that he created such concern among other members then he should have been banned without a second thought.
Here we go. Get over yourself.
Posts: 2435
Threads: 21
Joined: May 5, 2017
Reputation:
26
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 19, 2018 at 11:09 pm
(August 19, 2018 at 11:01 pm)Joods Wrote: (August 19, 2018 at 10:55 pm)Succubus Wrote: And yet without him breaking the sites rules some forum members were concerned enough that they reported him to plod?
Wouldn't an efficient moderating team delete the problem before it developed that far?
They contacted the police because there was enough cause to do so. It's called doing the right thing. You should try it sometime.
The fact that it wasn't about something site specific, is of no concern to you. If someone is presenting themselves as a danger to the public, there's a moral obligation to the public to keep people safe. If you have a problem with that then perhaps you should go play in fucking traffic.
When was he reported to the police. Date and time please.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.
Posts: 18544
Threads: 145
Joined: March 18, 2015
Reputation:
100
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 19, 2018 at 11:10 pm
(August 19, 2018 at 11:09 pm)Succubus Wrote: (August 19, 2018 at 11:01 pm)Joods Wrote: They contacted the police because there was enough cause to do so. It's called doing the right thing. You should try it sometime.
The fact that it wasn't about something site specific, is of no concern to you. If someone is presenting themselves as a danger to the public, there's a moral obligation to the public to keep people safe. If you have a problem with that then perhaps you should go play in fucking traffic.
When was he reported to the police. Date and time please.
Why is this such a concern for you? Are you his lawyer? No? Fuck off then.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work. If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now. Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Posts: 2435
Threads: 21
Joined: May 5, 2017
Reputation:
26
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 19, 2018 at 11:13 pm
(This post was last modified: August 19, 2018 at 11:22 pm by Succubus.)
(August 19, 2018 at 11:01 pm)Joods Wrote: (August 19, 2018 at 10:55 pm)Succubus Wrote: And yet without him breaking the sites rules some forum members were concerned enough that they reported him to plod?
Wouldn't an efficient moderating team delete the problem before it developed that far?
They contacted the police because there was enough cause to do so. It's called doing the right thing. You should try it sometime.
The fact that it wasn't about something site specific, is of no concern to you. If someone is presenting themselves as a danger to the public, there's a moral obligation to the public to keep people safe. If you have a problem with that then perhaps you should go play in fucking traffic.
If it wasn't something site specific then why were his activities being discussed here. That is bad etiquette.
(August 19, 2018 at 11:07 pm)Joods Wrote: (August 19, 2018 at 11:04 pm)Shell B Wrote: Lots of people do. Some of them might be right.
I don't think he's one of them. This place was running just fine before he came along and I'm sure it'll run just fine after he's gone.
Before I came along? Think before you type.
(August 19, 2018 at 11:08 pm)Shell B Wrote: (August 19, 2018 at 11:05 pm)Succubus Wrote: Removed him? Removed him from where? If his mind state was such that he created such concern among other members then he should have been banned without a second thought.
Here we go. Get over yourself.
Is this the best you can think of?
(August 19, 2018 at 11:10 pm)Joods Wrote: (August 19, 2018 at 11:09 pm)Succubus Wrote: When was he reported to the police. Date and time please.
Why is this such a concern for you? Are you his lawyer? No? Fuck off then.
Yes you know what's coming. When did Y'all call the cops.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.
Posts: 14932
Threads: 684
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
143
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 19, 2018 at 11:22 pm
(August 19, 2018 at 11:05 pm)Succubus Wrote: (August 19, 2018 at 10:58 pm)Tiberius Wrote: We reported him to the police the same time we removed him. We weren’t aware of the problem until his behavior was reported, so unless you have a suggestion on reading minds over the Internet or predicting the future, I’m not sure how more efficient we could have been.
Removed him? Removed him from where? If his mind state was such that he created such concern among other members then he should have been banned without a second thought.
Removed him from his position as admin, as well as from staff completely.
We don’t ban people here for any reason we feel like. We have forum rules for that. He didn’t break any rules. He didn’t threaten anyone on the site, he didn’t use the site inappropriately. Assholes are welcome here as members provided they follow the rules.
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation:
151
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 19, 2018 at 11:23 pm
(August 19, 2018 at 9:55 pm)Succubus Wrote: (August 19, 2018 at 9:50 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: LOL.
She did. There's pictures of the 2 of them together all over his facebook.
TROLL
FLIRT
|