Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
|
Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
|
 RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
May 8, 2015 at 12:03 am
I hope Stimbo will not be displeased, but the picture is of Conrad Veidt for the film The Man Who Laughs.
"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence." — David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
 RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
May 8, 2015 at 5:48 am
Hands up, now - who had to use Google images reverse lookup or whatever it's called?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
 RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
May 8, 2015 at 5:53 am
frodo, drich...and now Polaris? Seriously?
 RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
May 8, 2015 at 5:54 am
(This post was last modified: May 8, 2015 at 5:55 am by pocaracas.)
(May 8, 2015 at 5:53 am)alpha male Wrote: frodo, drich...and now Polaris? Seriously? fr0d0 got a perma-ban. Drich and polaris are 2 week bans.... Drich's temp-ban has ended a while back, but he hasn't returned.  Do note that none of them were banned because they are theists, but rather for breaching forum rules, particularly, abusing the report system, trolling and stuff like that. RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
May 8, 2015 at 5:55 am
Seriously. And for serious reasons. The latter two are still only temporary however. It's up to them whether they want to come back.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
 RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
May 8, 2015 at 6:06 am
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
May 8, 2015 at 6:16 am
In portuguese, FDP can represent something a bit derogate
F - Filho > son D - Da > of a P - Puta > bitch  RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
May 8, 2015 at 6:21 am
I've only just noticed. Mainly because I didn't pay too much attention to what they said.
Truthfully, I couldn't differenciate any of them from the plethora of theozomb's walking about aimlessly amongst the lower corridors of this forum. I only feel now for Esq. He took great pleasure in dismantling their mumblings, one idiotic sentence at a time. Esq, were they your arch enemies, your opposite equals?, or more like a couple of stubborn blowies you kept swiping at but couldn't kill. Anyway, at least they were introduced to a hammer worthy of their demise.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.  RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
May 8, 2015 at 6:34 am
(This post was last modified: May 8, 2015 at 6:36 am by robvalue.)
Good job staff, keep it up
 I totally reject the idea that there is bias against theists, I see no evidence of that. Plenty of atheists get banned and justifiably so. Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum  RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
May 8, 2015 at 6:36 am
If you go by the numbers, it is very clear. We ban way more atheists than theists.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<--- |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
