(July 25, 2015 at 10:27 am)Parkers Tan Wrote: That results in major changes in foreign policy happening every four or eight years.
It's also why our analysts try to develop advance strategies for every possible candidate running. But as things stand now, and will stand for at least the next year, the houses are in fundamental opposition to the president anyway. I think, one of the most damaging results of 2016 may be some president rolling back on the Iran deal. That would virtually destroy any chance for the US to be considered a trustworthy partner for decades.
But I don't think, the rightwing knuckleheads running care that much about being considered trustworthy.