(July 25, 2015 at 11:58 am)KevinM1 Wrote: Wait... is Randy really saying that if historical Jesus existed, then he must have been miraculous and divine? Because that's patently idiotic. And it's not at all what his playing deck of academic sources are getting at.
(July 25, 2015 at 11:59 am)abaris Wrote:(July 25, 2015 at 11:58 am)KevinM1 Wrote: Wait... is Randy really saying that if historical Jesus existed, then he must have been miraculous and divine? Because that's patently idiotic. And it's not at all what his playing deck of academic sources are getting at.
Did you expect anything less from a person who can't even make a distinction between fact and hearsay?
First, I have not made the simplistic connection that Kevin suggests.
Second, abaris seems to miss (or conveniently ignore) the point that these FACTS are accepted by men who have far more academic chops than the entire membership of this forum combined.