RE: Do 'pro-life' Christians ever . . .
July 25, 2015 at 2:25 pm
(This post was last modified: July 25, 2015 at 2:26 pm by Lek.)
(July 25, 2015 at 2:13 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: That's because it is not a scientifically verifiable terminus. It is a red herring. There is no "human test." As such it is only an attempt to shift the goalposts. We can only say that 'x weeks' is the point where it is extremely unlikely that a fetus will survive outside of the womb. And even then that number is moved back because of scientific intervention, a la NICUs.
I agree that it is not scientifically verifiable. That's one reason I am against abortion.
Quote:So you choose an non-viable fetus' life over the life of the mother. And don't say you sympathize for someone and then attempt to take their lives away. That is some dishonest rug pulling, no less. You clearly do not sympathize with the women. You are merely acknowledging that it sucks, but you know what's best for them.
No, I don't choose the life of a fetus over the life of the mother. If it's a "life for a life situation", I think the mother should make the decision.
