(July 26, 2015 at 5:59 pm)Lek Wrote:(July 26, 2015 at 5:36 pm)Neimenovic Wrote: Ok. When you make up your mind, let me know.
What if a rape victim's life was not threatened? Would you force her to carry her rapists child to term?
In most cases I think she should carry it to term, but I think I'd leave that decision to her.
I won't belittle this statement, because I think this is a little bit of a shift from your stance at the beginning of this thread.
I hope you see, Lek, that it is possible to be morally against something but support every person's right to make their own choices, even if you disagree with them.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
