(July 26, 2015 at 10:02 pm)Lek Wrote:(July 26, 2015 at 8:50 pm)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote: That's a very good question. So, how 'bout it Lek? How many little unwanteds have you and the missus adopted?!?
So your point is "don't take a moral position on anything someone does unless you're willing to take care of the consequences of that person's actions?"
I believe the correct phrasing to make the analogy correct would be "don't take a moral position on anything someone does because you forced them to unless you're willing to take care of the consequences of your moral stand."
Remember, there are no consequences unless you decide that having the baby is what a woman must do.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
