RE: Do 'pro-life' Christians ever . . .
July 28, 2015 at 11:29 pm
(This post was last modified: July 28, 2015 at 11:33 pm by SteelCurtain.)
(July 28, 2015 at 8:25 pm)Lek Wrote:(July 26, 2015 at 10:32 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: I knew you'd latch on to the last part without addressing the actual meat of the post.
What consequences are there when a woman aborts a <13 week old fetus?
Click on the reatured video at the site below. This illustrates very well what you're aborting at 13 weeks. Maybe there are few consequences for the parents, but the consequences are to the baby that is aborted; killed by the mother who conceived and would have nursed him or her. Since the child can feel, it must hurt. It makes want to barf thinking about it. Makes me even sicker when I see the videos of Planned Parenthood people acting so nonchalantly about being more careful during the procedure so they can end up with more complete body parts to sell.
http://www.babycenter.com/fetal-developm...s-13-weeks
The language you use is being spoon fed to you. Do you know that? Killed. A thing must be alive to be killed. A fetus at 13 weeks is no more alive than a tumor, as it cannot survive without its host.
I said it in the other thread, there is absolutely no evidence that PP sells "baby parts." They receive payment for the transport and care of donated fetal tissue, maternal blood, stem cell lines, and fetal cell lines. When a woman requests that her fetal tissue be donated, of course obstetricians take care so that they can preserve the tissue that is in most demand by researchers who are working so that other, wanted babies and adults can benefit from advanced medical procedures.
Fetal and infant retinal cell lines are being experimented on right now in research that has been used to help babies born with a congenital eye defect have a chance at vision. That can only happen if doctors take care when harvesting the tissue from a fetus that was going to be aborted anyways.
Come on, Lek, even you can see the sense in that.
If you thought you were sneaky by shifting the goalpost, you weren't. I sense that I am never going to get an answer as to what the consequences are when a woman has complete control over her reproductive health. We get it, Lek, you are disgusted by abortions. For you and maybe your spouse, that option is off the table. That's perfectly reasonable. But you have still not explained a reason that should make it okay for another person to not have that decision be an option.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---