(July 29, 2015 at 10:49 am)Esquilax Wrote:(July 29, 2015 at 9:20 am)lkingpinl Wrote: If I present to you a dictionary, with all of its pages containing all of the words we know, with all their definitions and in correct alphabetical order and bound in leather and enscribed on the front "Dictionary" and I tell you that this came about because of an explosion in a printing press, you would think it nonsense. There are far simpler things that we KNOW are created by an intelligence but we can look at the vast complexity of the universe and even more so humans and say time + chance? I don't think I'm the one being delusional to assume there must be a mind behind it.
If you're seriously just going to ignore every single response to you about emergent complexity, the circular argument you're making and so forth, in favor of just repeating this argument and pretending that nobody can rebut it, why on earth should we continue to engage you?
This is a discussion forum: if you refuse to discuss, what's the point?
My apologies Equilax, I missed one day and trying to keep up so I'm sure I missed some responses. Can you explain how you perceive my argument as circular?
We are not made happy by what we acquire but by what we appreciate.
