(July 27, 2015 at 11:33 am)robvalue Wrote: There was never any need for a god, it doesn't explain anything. It is the personification of the argument from ignorance/incredulity.
If you can even define what a god is, and how I can distinguish it from a non God, I'll be impressed
Science does not comment on "the supernatural". If God is defined to be outside the scope of the natural, then science has no interest in it. Science deals with what is real and testable, that's all.
Choose? I don't even know what "choosing God" means. If you choose it as an explanation then you've abandoned science at that point and are just making up answers to feel comfortable.
You're right in saying that science has no interest in God or the supernatural and cannot comment on God. Science also cannot explain the existence of the universe. So that leaves us open to different means to explore the origins of the cosmos.