Has Science done away with a need for God?

[Chas]

Are saying that if you see your full name carved clearly on a tree you could logically assume it is by pure natural means?  I've heard the arguments before about seeing a few letters formed out of sticks or in the clouds, what one can perceive to be letters therefore proof that not all language requires a creator.  But I'm talking about a full word written clearly or a sentence, something as simple as "Hello Esquilax" on a rock face.  You can them assume that no one wrote that but it's purely nature and your mind's perception?  

If so, we are at an impasse.  Any time we see language (clear written words that carry meaning) we deduce a mind.

But, so what?  DNA is not a language.