(July 29, 2015 at 5:20 pm)lkingpinl Wrote: If the symbols are shown to be repeatable or have a pattern to them or appear to carry meaning, yes I must deduce an intelligent agency. I would liken this to cave drawings or hieroglyphics. I cannot decipher them, but they clearly carry meaning and I cannot logically deduce that it occurred naturally.
So then what on earth are you actually using to deduce agency at all? If it's not intelligibility, or complexity, or even the available evidence, then what is informing these deductions? Seems to me you'll just assume agency at every turn, based on very little at all.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!