(July 30, 2015 at 1:41 am)Arrogant Christian Wrote: The reason I included the relation to science in that century is that he may have pursued what objectively had the most basis for truth at the time. Deriding good work in retrospect is hardly useful.
Theology is not good work, especially when concocting one so odious as his.
Many famous scientists got key things wrong, but their task was and is more noble by far than any theology you care to mention, because they work to learn and then teach men ... not shackle them.


