(July 31, 2015 at 10:20 pm)lkingpinl Wrote: Cato, and if you follow the other thread to theists asking how certain we are God exists you will see there I clearly stated 95% because to claim 100% certainty of something unverifiable is to claim omniscience and I will readily say I can not prove it to you but I can reasonably believe beyond reasonable doubt. If you want to discuss Christianity specifically we can but maybe through PM without the peanut gallery
Discussion that doesn't benefit from "the peanut" gallery is not discussion of evidence. You offered to discuss C.S. Lewis's argument from morality in private with me. What about it or your ability to believe beyond reasonable doubt requires hiding from the hoi polloi? I come to discussion forums to discuss with the many. With the exception of battle strategy, emotions, and embarrassing matters including TMI very little doesn't benefit from the voices of the many.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.