Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)

[Little Rik]

Enrico,

Non hai dimostrato nulla di quello che hai detto. Se la gente non ti crede un perché ci sarà.

Ogni volta che te ne esci con un thread nuovo, ecco una caterva di commenti di persone che ti chiedono sempre la stessa cosa - da dove te ne esci?

Ora, io sono una persona paziente e comprensiva, e voglio davvero capire da dove tiri fuori le tue strambe teorie. Se stai parlando di "spiriti", " anime", eccetera devi in qualche modo dimostrare che queste esistono, portando dei casi nei quali la loro azione non sia in NESSUN modo imputabile anche al cervello.

Devi soprattutto dimostrare che la coscienza riesca a sopravvivere in assenza di un cervello integro (o di strutture comparabili), se vuoi farci credere che da esso è separata.

Tutto fumo e niente arrosto... Basta con le canne, eh?

---

Enrico,

You haven't demonstrated anything of what you mentioned. If people don't believe you, there's a reason.

Every time you come up with a new thread there's always a buttload of people who ask you the same question: where are you coming from?

Now, I'm a patient guy and I really want to know where you pull your arguments out of (inb4 his arse, but bear with me). If you're talking about "spirits" and "souls" you've got to demonstrate that these things exist, bringing up examples in which their action is in NO way also possible for the brain to carry out.

Most of all, you've got to prove that consciousness is able to survive independently of a working brain (or any comparable kind of network) if you want us to believe such claims.

All smoke and no roast... Perhaps you should drop that joint, eh?

It is obvious that adults are reluctant to admit that they are wrong.
To admit it it would show a failure and most people are too proud
to admit a failure.
Beside their false believes are so entrenched that they find impossible to estirpate
from their mind the dogma.
So what they do?
They reject the obvious and blame those who tell the truth with talking bullshit. 
No wonder that my reputation here is next to zero while those who procrastinate the dogma
(false truth) have a very high reputation.
I destroyed the dogma that man is omnivore.
I show that nobody here knows the meaning of philosophy.
I show that there is no evidence that when the body die also the consciousness die.
I show that there can not be any real progress in the material-physical universe.
I show that with the limited human consciousness it is not possible to understand
what there may be outside so all option are possible.
Well, what else i can add other than reject your unfounded criticism.
An impartial and independent board would surely prove you wrong but who care.
After all i am having a lot of fun by enlightened your failure.