Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)

[Redbeard The Pink]

It is obvious that adults are reluctant to admit that they are wrong.
To admit it it would show a failure and most people are too proud
to admit a failure.
Beside their false believes are so entrenched that they find impossible to estirpate
from their mind the dogma.
So what they do?
They reject the obvious and blame those who tell the truth with talking bullshit. 
No wonder that my reputation here is next to zero while those who procrastinate the dogma
(false truth) have a very high reputation.
I destroyed the dogma that man is omnivore.
I show that nobody here knows the meaning of philosophy.
I show that there is no evidence that when the body die also the consciousness die.
I show that there can not be any real progress in the material-physical universe.
I show that with the limited human consciousness it is not possible to understand
what there may be outside so all option are possible.
Well, what else i can add other than reject your unfounded criticism.
An impartial and independent board would surely prove you wrong but who care.
After all i am having a lot of fun by enlightened your failure. 

Rikky...le sigh...

You haven't shown anything but your own willful ignorance. You keep saying things, but you don't ever show them to be true from evidence. You simply try to belittle anyone who doesn't agree with you. Now, while that is one of my favorite argumentative tactics (let's face it, I'm a dick), it's also not the only one I use. Would you like to know why? Fuck it, I'll tell you anyway.

It's because by itself, it's a useless fallacy. The argument of "lol, you're just a dumbass who doesn't get it" can only be used if your position is proven to a reasonable degree of certainty. Otherwise it's just an ad hominem attack.

The only thing you have shown is that you have an appallingly weak grip of science, logic, and philosophy, and that you intend to make no effort to correct this when taken to task by people who clearly and evidently understand these fields significantly better than you do. While that's very human, it's also not very smart.