Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 28, 2024, 10:39 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The scientific version of good and bad
#7
RE: The scientific version of good and bad
Your idea of "rewarding experience" reminds me of David Hume's ethical theory, which can be found in his Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals.

A very condensed discussion is at these links:

#17

#35

There is more discussion of it in that thread.


However, you might find it easier to start with Epicurus instead, though his position is less rigorous.  But it has the advantage of being easier to understand.

http://www.epicurus.net



As for suicide, here are three essays on the topic that I think are worth reading:


ESSAY IX: OF SUICIDE1

Letter 70

Letter 77


Regarding your idea of bringing back people from the dead and drugging them to feel high (which is what "eternal bliss" would be), that is rather fanciful.  I doubt we are going to be raising the dead.  Of course, it somewhat depends on what, exactly, one means by "dead," as one's heart can stop beating and it can sometimes be restarted, so if you were to imagine that "dead" just means that one's heart stopped beating, then one could raise the "dead" at least occasionally.  But if they are well and truly dead, rotted in the grave, then no, it is just a fictional fantasy.



As an aside, you might want to work on your essay writing skills, as much of the reaction you are getting seems due to that rather than the actual content of your post.

"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The scientific version of good and bad - by abaris - August 26, 2015 at 11:21 am
RE: The scientific version of good and bad - by Pyrrho - August 26, 2015 at 11:46 am
RE: The scientific version of good and bad - by Pyrrho - August 26, 2015 at 12:55 pm
RE: The scientific version of good and bad - by Alex K - August 26, 2015 at 1:22 pm
RE: The scientific version of good and bad - by brewer - August 26, 2015 at 2:23 pm
RE: The scientific version of good and bad - by brewer - August 26, 2015 at 4:29 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is "Cause and Effect" Scientific? Lord Andreasson 11 560 October 7, 2024 at 6:36 pm
Last Post: Sheldon
  So, what's up with airline food? And other bad jokes. Mechaghostman2 16 1919 January 23, 2020 at 8:36 pm
Last Post: Magilla
  Scientific/objective purpose of human species, may be to replicate universes blue grey brain 6 1263 November 25, 2018 at 10:17 am
Last Post: unfogged
  More Bad News For Creatards Minimalist 13 2686 August 10, 2017 at 12:26 am
Last Post: Sterben
  Intelligent Design as a scientific theory? SuperSentient 26 6812 March 26, 2017 at 11:07 pm
Last Post: SuperSentient
Exclamation Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over? theBorg 26 5334 August 18, 2016 at 8:17 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Questioning Scientific Titans ScepticOrganism 19 3627 July 1, 2016 at 11:56 am
Last Post: CapnAwesome
  Scientific Studies IATIA 9 2156 May 11, 2016 at 7:48 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  The Only Way To Stop A Bad Guy With A Club Minimalist 5 1430 January 21, 2016 at 2:51 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  More Bad News For Creatards Minimalist 4 1409 October 14, 2015 at 10:57 pm
Last Post: Reforged



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)