Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 26, 2025, 12:26 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The scientific version of good and bad
#11
RE: The scientific version of good and bad
I've read the entire OP. You've got some major flawed thinking.

According to what you stated, any action that I take (or action that is directed at me) that provides me a "rewarding experience" is therefore good? Flawed example: Lets say that I get a "rewarding experience" out of torturing small animals and killing people. I'm rewarded, therefore it is good. Flawed example: I abuse narcotics and get a short term "rewarding experience", therefore it is good. Flawed example: I get a "rewarding experience" every time someone abuses me, therefore it is good.

What exactly do you believe the scientific community should be testing? Describe a test? That your ideas should even be considered by the scientific community is grandiose and a bit delusional. Also the resurrection premise of eternal blissful life is magical thinking.

Why do we need to present your theory to the scientific community. If you believe it has validity you present it. Make and appointment with a psychologist or psychiatrist and hand him a copy. Something tells me you might have already tried this and not got the results you wanted. That is why you are enlisting us.

You have some revenge thoughts that are disturbing. Example: lighting people on fire, taking away others hope and meaning in life that you perceive have harmed you, killing morality so that it can have a rebirth into a life of eternal bliss.

You repeatedly mention "treatment resistant". Are you currently in/receiving treatment? If you are, please stay there. If you are not, please seek it out.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The scientific version of good and bad - by abaris - August 26, 2015 at 11:21 am
RE: The scientific version of good and bad - by Pyrrho - August 26, 2015 at 11:46 am
RE: The scientific version of good and bad - by Pyrrho - August 26, 2015 at 12:55 pm
RE: The scientific version of good and bad - by Alex K - August 26, 2015 at 1:22 pm
RE: The scientific version of good and bad - by brewer - August 26, 2015 at 2:23 pm
RE: The scientific version of good and bad - by brewer - August 26, 2015 at 4:29 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Serious] What is the current best scientific evidence we have that shows that consciousness... born_to_be_a_loser 28 1076 January 14, 2025 at 8:11 pm
Last Post: Tonus
  Is "Cause and Effect" Scientific? Lord Andreasson 11 844 October 7, 2024 at 6:36 pm
Last Post: Sheldon
  So, what's up with airline food? And other bad jokes. Mechaghostman2 16 2136 January 23, 2020 at 8:36 pm
Last Post: Magilla
  Scientific/objective purpose of human species, may be to replicate universes blue grey brain 6 1383 November 25, 2018 at 10:17 am
Last Post: unfogged
  More Bad News For Creatards Minimalist 13 2903 August 10, 2017 at 12:26 am
Last Post: Sterben
  Intelligent Design as a scientific theory? SuperSentient 26 7162 March 26, 2017 at 11:07 pm
Last Post: SuperSentient
Exclamation Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over? theBorg 26 5711 August 18, 2016 at 8:17 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Questioning Scientific Titans ScepticOrganism 19 3849 July 1, 2016 at 11:56 am
Last Post: CapnAwesome
  Scientific Studies IATIA 9 2312 May 11, 2016 at 7:48 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  The Only Way To Stop A Bad Guy With A Club Minimalist 5 1492 January 21, 2016 at 2:51 am
Last Post: ignoramus



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)