(August 25, 2015 at 5:13 am)robvalue Wrote: Assumption: God created everything.
Evidence: There is stuff.
Conclusion: God created this stuff (using the assumption), thus confirming the assumption.
Assumption: God created everything.
Evidence: There is stuff.
Conclusion: My religion is right and everybody else is wrong.
We've been bamboozeled. Was not the op question how theist get to the final conclusion from the original assumption? So they keep the discussion stuck on proving the original assumption as if that will automatically prove the final conclusion.
Thee must be a name for this kind of fallacy. drippyism? Gcesque? chadified? orangelated?
The god who allows children to be raped out of respect for the free will choice of the rapist, but punishes gay men for engaging in mutually consensual sex couldn't possibly be responsible for an intelligently designed universe.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire
Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire
Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.