Core Message Of Christianity Isn't One Of Love

[Jenny A]

---

The story of Adam and Eve is ridiculous, and so is the concept of original sin.  

The doctrine of 'original sin' is not a biblical one.

"Shit, Eve ate this apple.  I'm going to make childbirth for her really painful.  And because I'm an asshole, childbirth is going to be painful for all women for the rest of history.

 Get an epidural

All because she ate the apple (nevermind that the other women who come after her didn't have the same opportunity)

that's not true. We all have the same opportunity everytime we are faced with the temptation of sin.

after a talking snake (HOW THE FUCK DOES A SNAKE TALK, AND WHY DON'T THEY TALK ANYMORE?) told her to.

 
IDK... Maybe the same way Eddie Murphy made a 'Dunkey' talk.

Also this sin is going to be passed down from mother to son/daughter forever and ever.  Why?  Because Fuck humans.  That's why."

Ah, no. All adam and Eve passed down was the knowledge of good and evil, the tree represented nothing more. The tree itself was not evil it only offered the knowledge of it. with knowledge comes responsibility.

---

And how the fuck do you explain Cavemen?

http://atheistforums.org/thread-14190.html
read the op

If Adam and Eve were truly the first humans, then ALL civilizations would have the same or similar story of creation, because it'd have been passed down from generation to generation.  All civilizations don't have the same story of creation, ergo... the story can't be true.

ah, no.. if you still think this click on the link above and re-read the op.

Oh the wonders I missed by not being a member in 2012.   Man evolved for a billion years while Adam and Eve live immortally in the garden and then God pitches them out among the  soulless "monkey men" that have been evolving meanwhile.

Every time I think I've seen the most batshit crazy apologetic yet, someone comes along and ups the ante.  Apparently Drich claims it as original:

I have only taken the face value account of Genesis and lined the holes up with the holes in the evolutionary account of origins and they fit together perfectly.

What do you think? I would like to refine and clean up this account of origins and start circulating it. Because there is literally nothing the atheist can say or do to disprove anything. Their standard goto the evidence only further supports the creation account at this point. This takes the account of "origins" out of the atheist arsenal for a legitmate reason they do not believe in God. While on the Atheist website because they saw the logic of this explanation many who originally greeted me with harsh words and complete disrespect started to ask legitimate questions.

 From Drich's original OP.