preachers on AF rant

[Drich]

Here is what appears to be a foolish question... Did you actually click on the links provided by this "af preacher?"

Maybe if he provided links to previous threads of his own work, he isn't posting to tracts of scripture or some other well worn church tactic. Perhaps this "af preacher" is pointing back to to an experience, or arguement (or both) that he has had in the past the directly addresses what you (one of many people like you/ex Christians ) have to say and think about 'proof of God.'

Maybe this "af preacher" is looking to see how envolved you will get on this topic before he willing to invest the effort needed to give a noob shooting cliche'-ed/atheist standard arguments from the hip.

Standard atheist argument= standard Christian response..

Or at least that how I would do it.

I believe that my original post states that I clicked on the links.  
arguement should be spelled "argument".   envolved should be spelled "involved".   "he willing to invest the effort"   --  really now.   

Don't bother investing your time, Drich.  Really.  Nothing you can possibly type is going to have any effect on me other than wasting our time.   No personal story, no bible verse, no quote, no author, no theologian's argument, no cute remembrance - - I do not accept any of that as "proof".

Again sport, what if those were your 'remembrances'? (If you did click on BOTH links provided you would be speaking to not only the instance I have described but the principle driving it, you only speak to the instance which tells me you did not read the other link like you said you did or you do not understand it.)

Either way the question now is if God sent you a messenger to out line your whole life for you (past present and future) would you deny Him?

That is the question you seem to be avoiding/do not understand.

(Maybe if you did not spend so much time grading spelling you might be able to have/hold a topical conversation.)