RE: Test my belief system
September 2, 2015 at 2:22 am
(This post was last modified: September 2, 2015 at 2:26 am by robvalue.)
Yes, that is a direct result of my sliding scale, which I completely admit to. In this case, I am explicitly placing the wellbeing of my dog above the lives of fleas. I have to decide one way or the other, harm will happen either way. It's not a decision I'm at all happy about making. It's not a hard science, I'm estimating and doing my best. If there was a way to accomplish the same goal without hurting anything, I would do it. I will admit there is a selfish element here: I feel particularly responsible for my dog, and I would feel awful if I knowingly allowed her to suffer.
I am interested in learning more about how other life forms feel, yes. I can't say I've spent a lot of time researching it when it comes to lower forms of life (insects and smaller). Perhaps I should. But realistically, I have to draw the line somewhere and "not worry" about the effects of life below that line. It sounds callous to say that, but compromises have to be made. I have only a limited amount of time to make each decision and I literally can't weigh up the eventual effects to everything. That being said, I don't cause any needless harm to anything, so I do still care about things below that line and I carry out anything I need to do in the most humane way I can.
I'm not claiming to be perfect, morality is hugely complex. I'm doing my best, and as you point out, I don't have all the information. It's probably impossible to have all the information. I probably fail at times, or do things which I could objectively say are hypocritical; I think that's true of everyone. But it's my ideal, and I strive to improve my morality always. I can't have a belief that "I'm perfect and will always achieve maximum morality" because I'm not, and I won't.
I am interested in learning more about how other life forms feel, yes. I can't say I've spent a lot of time researching it when it comes to lower forms of life (insects and smaller). Perhaps I should. But realistically, I have to draw the line somewhere and "not worry" about the effects of life below that line. It sounds callous to say that, but compromises have to be made. I have only a limited amount of time to make each decision and I literally can't weigh up the eventual effects to everything. That being said, I don't cause any needless harm to anything, so I do still care about things below that line and I carry out anything I need to do in the most humane way I can.
I'm not claiming to be perfect, morality is hugely complex. I'm doing my best, and as you point out, I don't have all the information. It's probably impossible to have all the information. I probably fail at times, or do things which I could objectively say are hypocritical; I think that's true of everyone. But it's my ideal, and I strive to improve my morality always. I can't have a belief that "I'm perfect and will always achieve maximum morality" because I'm not, and I won't.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum