(September 11, 2015 at 10:07 am)Aractus Wrote: No, it's an observation. It's probably got to do with 200,000 - 300,000 years of the men being the "hunters" before present.
If you say so, seems a little different to what you stated earlier:
(September 11, 2015 at 4:36 am)Aractus Wrote: it's obvious that "men are better than women in combat" - why else can't women compete equitable against men in sports?