RE: How would you write a one-liner law against theism?
September 13, 2015 at 9:33 pm
(This post was last modified: September 13, 2015 at 9:36 pm by TheRocketSurgeon.)
(September 13, 2015 at 8:56 pm)Cecelia Wrote: 1. Church and State shall remain separated in such that the government shall not have any involvement in religion (including protecting religious definitions, no laws shall be passed solely based on religious doctrine nor to protect any religious institutes, or putting up religious monuments on public grounds, and excepting for court cases involving church officials and crimes committed by clergy including but not limited to child molestation and extortion) and the church shall not have any involvement in government (including endorsing candidates) save for the express paying of taxes.
- A.) Any tax-exempt religious organization whose clergy or leadership are found guilty in civil court of attempting to interfere with political affairs, impose law that favors their religious belief as in section 1 above, or otherwise influence the social order in a way that infringes upon the religious liberties or other civil rights of members not of their religious organization shall permanently lose tax-exempt status, and shall forfeit such properties as necessary to cover the debt, in the event that taxes cannot or will not be paid.
- B.) It shall be a criminal offense, punishable by not more than twenty and not less than five years in prison, for any organizational member who commits or attempts to commit the above offenses, if accompanied by actions which would conceal or mislead agents or police officers tasked with investigating such actions by the religious organizations.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
