(September 15, 2015 at 10:41 am)robvalue Wrote: I don't understand that response.Not surprising, as you don't pose a clear scenario. you speak of people killing the baby, then the baby somehow making a choice. If you think it through and propose a clear scenario, you might pose better questions, and might better understand the answers you receive.
Quote:I'm pretending it's all true,You're pretending what's all true?
Quote:and I'm asking if it's in the best interests of the baby to kill it.And you got an answer: "Not necessarily. There are heavenly rewards based on actions in this life. If killed as a baby, it could have a lesser life in heaven than if it lived longer."
Quote:If you were the baby and you had two doors, one to heaven and one to earth with only the possibility of heaven, which would you choose?Sure. Give me the high five. If we had faith as big as a mustard seed we could move mountains, but I don't see any mountains moving. There's a reason Christianity is called a faith.
Are you saying you'd have enough reasonable doubt that it's all true to stop you killing the baby? No one has admitted that yet, but I highly suspect it's almost universally the case. First person to admit it gets a heathen high-five.
Quote:PS: you think a baby gets a lesser life in heaven because it gets killed?I don't know for sure, but it's possible considering that there are rewards given for actions in this life.
Quote:Wow that is a shitty system God set up. How is that fair on the baby? What a ginormous cock God is to punish someone for being killed as an infant.How is it unfair?
By analogy, if someone gave you a Cadillac, and he gave someone else a Ferrari, is he a ginormous cock for giving you the Cadillac? Did he punish you by giving you a Cadillac? This is typical atheist reasoning which I just don't understand.