RE: Hi, I'm a Christian. Help Me Disprove My Religion!
September 29, 2015 at 8:45 am
(This post was last modified: September 29, 2015 at 8:48 am by Mr Greene.)
As far as I can tell the core problem with the possible 'hard' evidence is that it is also classified as 'relics' and thus has/had a financial value to the church.
eg: Splinters of the 'True Cross', the mass of which when considered together amount to several forests...
Therein lies the problem with the 'masses of evidence', there is simply too bloody much of it and the bulk is obviously fake, produced for financial gain.
We have only to look at the Shroud of Turin to see how unreliable the evidence is.
eg: Splinters of the 'True Cross', the mass of which when considered together amount to several forests...
Therein lies the problem with the 'masses of evidence', there is simply too bloody much of it and the bulk is obviously fake, produced for financial gain.
We have only to look at the Shroud of Turin to see how unreliable the evidence is.
Quote:I don't understand why you'd come to a discussion forum, and then proceed to reap from visibility any voice that disagrees with you. If you're going to do that, why not just sit in front of a mirror and pat yourself on the back continuously?-Esquilax
Evolution - Adapt or be eaten.
