RE: Evidence that God exists
March 1, 2009 at 1:44 pm
(This post was last modified: March 1, 2009 at 1:51 pm by fr0d0.)
(March 1, 2009 at 12:53 pm)Tiberius Wrote: There is the conflict. You cannot claim that you have faith in God and can prove he exists.Well that's what I said, yes (apart from the conflict part). As far as I can see, it's the non religious that are endlessly asking for evidence. So the conflict is them with themselves??
(March 1, 2009 at 12:53 pm)Tiberius Wrote: To have faith in something means there is no way of proving it without evidence.erm.. and again
(March 1, 2009 at 12:53 pm)Tiberius Wrote: If you claim you have proof of God, I want to see the evidence.I'd wan't to see the psychiatrist's report, as that'd be an impossible statement, which is my point.
(March 1, 2009 at 1:21 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: Believing in God on faith - because you can't believe in him BASED on evidence - because there isn't any - isn't a good reason to believe!Did somebody say it was?
(March 1, 2009 at 1:21 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: That's backwards. If its drivel then its drivel until someone gives a good reason that its NOT drivel. You can't prove a negative - the burden of proof is on the 'drivel believer' - or someone who suggests drivel - to show that its not drivel. Its not on anyone to show that the drivel ISN'T drivel. If its drivel then its drivel until otherwise is shown!You've missed the point EF. Nice rant about why you shouldn't believe in a God. Maybe another time