(March 1, 2009 at 2:01 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote:Hope you aren't getting dizzy up there on that horse(March 1, 2009 at 1:44 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: You've missed the point EF. Nice rant about why you shouldn't believe in a God. Maybe another time
Missed the point have I? I just corrected you on what I thought was completely incorrect. You don't need to show why something ISN'T drivel. If something's drivel then its assumed to be drivel until someone DOES show it isn't.

(March 1, 2009 at 2:01 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: God is assumed to be drivel untill there is evidence of him.Ridiculous to you, I have no problem with that. But unfortunately that is precisely what belief in God is all about. Belief without proof. For you to pull it up because of lack of proof seems pointless.
So: its NOT ridiculous to require evidence of God. On the contrary, its ridiculous to believe in God WITHTOUT requiring evidence.