Hi, I'm a Christian. Help Me Disprove My Religion!

[Aractus]

---

Aractus

Weren't you James Bond a while ago ? last time I was here you had 007 in your avatar..and a Christian faith..I think that's you.

Oh well, typical "ex christian" who crossed to atheism, yet forgot to let go of the anti-Islam propaganda the local priest was feeding to him in the days of old. I just know it when you start by writing "typical Muslim".

No Mr Bond, I'm not your "typical Muslim". I'm something else.

In my comment, I said:

My memory doesn't serve me right in remembering the Bible's history

In other words : I'm not a computer.

But yet again, the forgery comes from the inside out. What you couldn't understand, is that the priests forged it. Even if the version is that ancient, Jesus's friends weren't all pure, with many traitors already in his ranks.

About the dates, maybe this will convince you :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_method

If the archaeological evidence is not there, -which is Jesus himself- is not found, then how should you perform an accurate historical method ?
Again, in an age where most of his followers were crucified & killed, witnessing one of the worst oppression in history, how would the traditions still be kept ?

If you try to convince me for ages, that history is accurate, I will never believe you. I saw a book not that old -Quran- going under ongoing forging attempts, whole events written by the victors -in my own lifetime-, so please, what accuracy do you speak about ?

This book is forged. A simple reading through it would prove that, with countless contradictions, accompanied by a Roman scent.

---

No AtlaSS, I was never fed any anti-Islamic /anti-Catholic /anti-Orthodox information. The fact is what you, the Orthodox, and the Catholics believe about the Bible has been scientifically disproved. The Old Testament has not been systemically edited at any time after the 2nd century BC.

It doesn't matter to me who you are, if I see people making typical uninformed atheist statements I call it for what it is. And your arguments are just that - uninformed. They come wholesale from Islamic apologist sources, and yet you have the gall to claim it as your original thought. Some of the NT books are forged, however we have the epistle of James, the 7-9 authentic epistles of Paul (Romans, 1 & 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians, Philemon, probably Ephesians, and possibly 2 Thessalonians). We have the four gospels and Acts. Luke-Acts is written by the one author, who doesn't identify himself but scholars believe it was either Luke or a close associate of Luke. Acts 13-28 is in the first person narrative, so is written by someone with first-hand experience. If you'd bothered to check modern scholarship you would know this. We also have the short epistle of Jude, and the very shot epistles of 1-3 John.

The epistle of James is either written in the 40s or 50s AD, and most scholars place it being written shortly before the Jerusalem council (Acts 15/Gal 1) around 48-49AD.

As for analysing the evidence, you are not qualified to do that. All you are qualified to do is to look to respected historians in the relevant field and cite them.

I point you to my earlier post in this same thread , if you're going to disagree AtlasS you need to provide evidence, not just some uninformed opinion you formed by reading Islamic apologist propaganda.