Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 26, 2024, 11:22 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Young Earth Creationism Vs. Science (Statler Waldorf Contd)
#50
RE: Young Earth Creationism Vs. Science (Statler Waldorf Contd)
(December 1, 2010 at 1:10 am)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Haha, yet you fail to be specific. Nicely done. I think the reason you don't debate Creationists is because you'd get your butt kicked. They don't allow you to just make assertions (like you did here) in debates.

You say you read Scientific sources, yet you have not cited one, and you say I just make things up, yet I cite more sources than anyone else on here. Classic!

I will cheerfully admit I don't have scientific education beyond a high school level. However I have read enough to understand things such as genetics, geology and biology to a degree, I can accept evolution by natural selection as a fact.

In fact I will ask you a question, why do we share the same mutation which shuts off the ability to artificially produce vitamin c in our bodies as a lot of primates.

Okay you want sources, here are a couple aims more towards the interested layman to start off with.

Genes, Peoples, and Languages by Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza and The Journey of Man: A Genetic Odyssey by Spencer Wells[/i]. Those two men are among the most eminent population geneticists.

Quote: Huh? So you are agreeing with me? Amoebas in the fossil record are morphologically almost identical to amoebas today, so they have not been "evolving" much at all. A bacterium that was collected in the 19th century is still identifiable today, despite there being thousands of generations separating the two. So since amoebas that are supposedly nearly a billion years old also have over 3 billion bits of genetic information in their cells, where did all this information come from?

I am very familiar with lifeforms evolving very little over vast periods of time, they are called living fossils such as the Coelacanth is a most famous example. Also likewise evolution can occur a relatively rapid period, it is called a Punctuated equilibrium. However there is no doubt amoebas are more complex than the first lifeforms on Earth were and 2 billion years is plenty of time for the ameobas to evolve the 3 billion bits of genetic information.
undefined
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Young Earth Creationism Vs. Science (Statler Waldorf Contd) - by Justtristo - December 1, 2010 at 1:52 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Young more likely to pray than over-55s - survey zebo-the-fat 16 1597 September 28, 2021 at 5:44 am
Last Post: GUBU
  Creationism Foxaèr 203 11865 August 23, 2020 at 2:25 am
Last Post: GrandizerII
  A theory about Creationism leaders Lucanus 24 7247 October 17, 2017 at 8:51 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Prediction of an Alien Invasion of Earth hopey 21 4864 July 1, 2017 at 3:36 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  Science Vs. The Forces of Creationism ScienceAf 15 3010 August 30, 2016 at 12:04 am
Last Post: Arkilogue
  Debunking the Flat Earth Society. bussta33 24 5205 February 9, 2016 at 3:38 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Earth Glare_ 174 21589 March 25, 2015 at 10:53 pm
Last Post: Spooky
  Defending Young-Earth Creationism Scientifically JonDarbyXIII 42 10714 January 14, 2015 at 4:07 am
Last Post: Jacob(smooth)
  creationism belief makes you a sicko.. profanity alert for you sensitive girly men heathendegenerate 4 2051 May 7, 2014 at 12:00 am
Last Post: heathendegenerate
  Religion 'Cause Of Evil Not Force For Good' More Young People Believe downbeatplumb 3 2392 June 25, 2013 at 1:43 pm
Last Post: Brian37



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)