(October 7, 2015 at 12:41 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:(October 7, 2015 at 12:30 pm)Faith No More Wrote: He can't be pulling in money from any donors anymore, can he? It seems to me that he has to be running on his own dime right now, which makes it all the more puzzling that he remains. He must really be out of his gourd.
We get regular spam from the Jindal campaign at work. It's hilarious. Despite all their bluster and no matter how hard they try to put a good face on this train wreck, you can practically smell the flop sweat oozing from the monitor. But they still have the balls to ask for money.
A recent email crowed about Jindal having pulled even with (or at least close to) a couple of other pathetic also-rans in some poll. It was so deliciously sad I almost fell out of my chair laughing. At this point, the only way Jindal could avoid total humiliation and preserve a shred of dignity would be to commit Seppuku live on Fox News.
Ho-lee-sheet, you just came up with the one scenario in which I would ever deign to watch FNC, ever again!
Didn't think it could be done.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
