Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)

[Little Rik]

But let us talk about the mantra.
It is true what i did post in the past (as you post it again) but what this has to do with my saying that Hindu mantra is useless?
Hindus use an old mantra and like all old thing is not helpful these days.
Sarkar on the other hand give us an individual mantra in tune with today universal vibrations.
And the evidence that is the right mantra is that is working.
If the Hindu mantra would work these people would not be following dreadful dogmas like those who i just show you in the previous post.  

That you use different ones doesn't change the fact that Sarkar borrowed the idea of a mantra.  
His whole practice is one part new bullshit and one part old dogmas.

You don't see it because one of the dogmas is that you don't follow dogmas.  It's a lie.

Borrow from who yog?
It would be bizarre to borrow the mantra from Hinduism when in fact Sarkar is (was) against all Hindu dogmas which are the pillar of Hinduism.
Beside AM mantras are totally different from Hinduism mantra.
You can't borrow the idea of the mantra.
If you borrow you borrow the whole mantra.
Why Sarkar would borrow a mantra that lead to such bad dogmas like the caste system the dowry the untouchable the sacred cow the many Gods and so on?
Only an idiot or a thickhead would think like this.