(October 13, 2015 at 10:57 am)jenny1972 Wrote:(October 13, 2015 at 10:23 am)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote: And yet, with all that ongoing searching and discovery all we've ever found are naturalistic explations fo things that used to be seen as acts of gawd(s). Never any supporting evidencee for any gawd claims.
Hmmmmm. Wonder why that is?
because measuring thoughts and detecting God with technology is not possible yet
Well, if you can't detect god in any objective sense then that's kind of the end of the idea of rationally believing in one.
"Cannot meet the burden of proof," is not the same thing as "does not need to meet the burden of proof," and I'm really very perplexed at how many religious people want to secretly substitute the former with the latter.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!