(December 8, 2010 at 7:37 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Whiner. It's easy for you to reply to one poster, it takes way more time for me to reply to ten different posters. If I was truly trying to avoid any particular topics why would I leave it up to you to decide what I respond to? If you want me to, I can respond to your misunderstandings about information theory, or I can respond to some other point you brought up, but I am not going through your post line by line, just like I am not going through the other eight responses I received today line by line. Give me a break. So you can either choose which argument is best for me to respond to, or I will just choose one to respond to.
In all fairness Statler, you have dodged many of my posts before this point. So I can hardly be blamed for suspecting the same here.
That being said, I was a little tired last night, so I apologise for being short with you.
I'd like you to address the responses to your claims about the mechanisms of evoloution and increases in information which you have asserted are false.
Cheers
Sam
"We need not suppose more things to exist than are absolutely neccesary." William of Occam
"Our doubts are traitors, and make us lose the good we oft might win by fearing to attempt" William Shakespeare (Measure for Measure: Act 1, Scene 4)
"Our doubts are traitors, and make us lose the good we oft might win by fearing to attempt" William Shakespeare (Measure for Measure: Act 1, Scene 4)