Are all atheists this ill-informed about religion?

[RoadRunner79]

---

Ohhh... can always rely on bringing out the fallacies checklist.  I was making statements... particularly about math though. 

---

You apparently don't know much about fallacies, nor sarcasm.  Argumentum ex culo is a sardonic way of telling you you're pulling your argument out of your ass. It's not actually a logical fallacy as much as it is simply an unsupported assertion.

I did gather that when I looked it up... However I don't understand the complaint. Is my understanding of algebra faulty, or can I add apples and oranges, to get a total number of apples.

---

When speaking of "person" in regards to the trinity, we are speaking of three distinct consciences (self identity).   Think of this as a "who" statement.

When speaking of the essence or nature (being)... think of this a "what" statement.  It is the substance of what makes God... God.

---

This is the ex culo part, because Christianity posits a personal god. He is not a title, he is a being. You're trying to have it both ways when you argue this.

I believe I said being.

So you worship a schizophrenic, then.  Got it.

I don't believe that is accurate.

And it is not speaking about bodies... God is spirit and omnipresent.

Yes, I'm aware of that unsubstantiated claim, too.  Until I see a basis for accepting it, it too goes into the scrapheap. It's all very convenient to posit a truism that cannot be verified at all -- convenient, but not convincing.

OK...I'm familiar with pseudo-skepticism and it is expected.