The way I understand faith it's more about emotion than logic though?
And of course you can wish that certain things were true despite the fact there's no evidence.
And you can wish that things WEREN'T true, but if the evidence is there, ignoring it because it goes against your "faith" I don't think would be a logical choice.
I just understand faith as belief without evidence. So how is faith logical? What do you do if your faith doesn't fit with the evidence so you are out of touch with reality?
And when you have no supporting reasons faith is added because there's no evidence so you settle for just "having faith". So the reason to have faith in God is because having faith is God is a good reason?
Seems circular to me. If its not circular then what are these supporting reasons exactly if it's not faith supporting itself (i.e, circular logic)? Is it evidence? I doubt they'd count as evidence. For if they did then you wouldn't need faith because faith is belief without evidence!
And of course you can wish that certain things were true despite the fact there's no evidence.
And you can wish that things WEREN'T true, but if the evidence is there, ignoring it because it goes against your "faith" I don't think would be a logical choice.
I just understand faith as belief without evidence. So how is faith logical? What do you do if your faith doesn't fit with the evidence so you are out of touch with reality?
And when you have no supporting reasons faith is added because there's no evidence so you settle for just "having faith". So the reason to have faith in God is because having faith is God is a good reason?
Seems circular to me. If its not circular then what are these supporting reasons exactly if it's not faith supporting itself (i.e, circular logic)? Is it evidence? I doubt they'd count as evidence. For if they did then you wouldn't need faith because faith is belief without evidence!