Are all atheists this ill-informed about religion?

[Chad32]

---

What does resolving sola scriptura have to do with anything in this discussion? Have you even looked into the issue? Are you assuming (wrongly, it should be pointed out), that sola scriptura is core doctrine?

To what extent is the indeterminacy of, say, experimental findings in a scientific subfield an indictment on science? If it's not, how in God's name does your brain convince you that indeterminacy in a particular area of theology an indictment on religion?

It's confused responses like these that ask to be ignored.


Heck no. This discussion is situated specifically in the context of atheists who bring up doctrinal differences.

But since you brought it up, tell me, what are the different views on what it takes to get to heaven?


You're making me repeat myself here. 

The fact that most of the atheists here are (still!) too ignorant to even make a distinction between between core and peripheral doctrine, let alone have a clue on what might constitute core doctrine tells me they have no idea what they are talking about. Desperate for some basis to critique religion, they find something that looks like it might work, and mindlessly repeat it like a mantra.

To point out how confused this response is, keep in mind: The discussion is about doctrinal differences between Christians.

Now look at your critique of the Apostles' Creed: It's an atheistic critique of Christian claims!

---

---

No? Good.

---

If religious nitwits actually thought that it was good for people to be religious they wouldn't fight and kill people who have different religions than theirs.  All religious nitwits want everyone to be in the same cult that they are in.  But some religious nitwits are such  bigots that they hate other people who are in their cult because they are of a different race.
http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law...3_03a.html

We either eat MY sky cake, or nobody eats at all! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55h1FO8V_3w