(October 27, 2015 at 12:28 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(October 27, 2015 at 12:14 pm)alpha male Wrote: If you're reading it literally, then:
A. There was already light before the sun, so no problem with photosynthesis.
B. The sun came a day after the plants. Plants don't die from one day without light.
So again...what's the problem?
The problem is that now you're stuck ascribing to literal 24-hour day creation, else your second point makes no sense. That form of literalist creationism is demonstrably wrong in every sense we have ever tested.
You've swapped a small problem for a bigger one, and yet you're still wondering where the issue is?
So you agree that I've refuted the small problem, which is all that I was discussing - great!
