(October 22, 2015 at 10:45 am)Little Rik Wrote:(October 20, 2015 at 10:57 am)paulpablo Wrote: Everything you write is a pile of shit made up of broken English which is barely readable. I was repeating back to you the definition of atheism you gave me and showing you how it contradicts what you're saying. If you think your definition of atheism is garbage then don't use it.
An atheist could believe aliens will give us life after death, an atheist could believe in spirits, an atheist could believe our brains are collected after death by the cats of mordor.
Most atheists simply reject all ideas of god that they have been exposed too anything else is incidental.
Basically you come up with a claim that can't be proven or disproven by science and then say it's unscientific to not believe in it because it can't be disproven.
Little Rik do you believe that the spirit of the Chinese dancing unicorn with hooves of wallnuts lives within pluto? If not then that is very unscientific of you because it hasn't been disproven.
If not then that's very unscientific of you because scientists haven't disproven it.
Pablo.
You are making a hell of a confusion.
While most atheists state that what i exposed as dogmas are true despite the fact that science has never come up with solid evidence i on the other hand do not state that God is real.
I do believe that is real because the more i expand my consciousness the more i understand that at the end of the road there is something infinite and great that i called God.
I do not state that, i believe.
The difference is huge Pablo.
It is impossible for you or anyone else that expect the bread to fall from the sky or that God manifest in your inner self to believe and i can not possibly come up with solid evidence that God exist as evidence can only be individual according to one effort and understanding of how the system works.
You guys on the other hand STATE something with no evidence to back these statements up.
You're on repeat like a broken record.
Most atheists on here STATE things I don't think is accurate or correct.
A lot of atheists on here STATE political opinions I disagree with.
Atheism has FUCK ALL to do with these statements. Nothing.
Due to that plainly obvious fact I've never felt the need to start a thread on this forum with a title "ATHEISM IS POLITCALLY WRONG AND LOGICALLY INCORRECT"
Everytime you're about to post a new post in this thread, go back and read the definition of atheism which you yourself used, and think carefully about it.
A rejection of belief in the existence of deities
Now if an atheist on this forum was to say "I know god doesn't exist, not just the myths around god, but any possibility of god." I would be inclined to say that's an illogical statement to make.
That doesn't make me NOT an atheist, I still reject beliefs in god, but I can't say that I find it logical for someone else to state that they know God does not exist. I'd view it with as much scepticism as I'd view a statement from someone who says they know god DOES exist.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.