RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
October 28, 2015 at 2:37 am
(This post was last modified: October 28, 2015 at 2:41 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
(October 27, 2015 at 9:59 pm)pool Wrote:(October 27, 2015 at 6:53 am)houseofcantor Wrote: I think you need to change the water in your bong.
Yep.But I'm right though aren't I?
Stones fell down before gravity was discovered.
Gravity isn't a real thing though,it's made up.
Gravity isn't a real thing but what is an attempt to explain why stones fell down.
So when we say that gravity was discovered what we mean is - an explanation as to why stones came down to earth was discovered.
Congratulations. You've discovered the difference between "theory" and "fact".
(October 27, 2015 at 9:59 pm)pool Wrote: I mean like,science is never going to find out the ^source^ (if you know what I mean,i.e,how gravity came to be or how motion came to be or how anything came to be.)
How do you know what will be discovered in the future? Scientists have hypotheses that might explain, for instance, gravity. We may well learn why gravity exists once they are tested.
(October 27, 2015 at 9:59 pm)pool Wrote: (Also I have this theory that if the earth is the result of the big bang then the nearest planets of earth should also exhibit the features of earth.I thought about this after looking at how when I heated oil and it would pop then some popping would be localized to that region.)
But now you're forgetting a couple of things: firstly, our neighbor planets largely do share our composition of heavy minerals, and secondly, gravity (there's that word again!) will tend to sort the materials of the solar system from heaviest to lightest outward from the source of the gravity, in this case our Sun. The fact that that is what we actually see helps to confirm our current understanding of gravity, by the way.