Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)

[Little Rik]

What i find very funny Pablo is the fact that i never seen an atheist in this forum that criticize an other atheist for stating something that is not back up by solid evidence that is why i think that your analysis is worthless.
If you really mean what you say i would have seen your criticism when someone state something without evidence but not, i never seen that.
Now you are talking about SCEPTICISM.
What a load of bull.
Skepticism is like a fart.
If you really think that something doesn't make sense you face head on the issue by criticize him-her.
I noticed that when a theist state something that is not back up by evidence the atheists are always ready to jump on the theist neck but when an atheist do the same it never happen.
In English language this way of doing is better known as DISHONESTY.  

copy and paste some of the statements you have seen that have no solid evidence backing them up.  I will then proceed to publicly criticize those statements on this thread as not having any evidence.  It's as simple as that.
It won't effect my position as an atheist as you have been repeatedly told.  Nothing anyone says on this forum effects the actual definition of what atheism is.

Ok. let us copy and past something that i just choose by random on page 10 of this thread.
Here on the (27th September 2015, 08:57)Little Rik Wrote:
Has already been established that there is No evidence that with the physical death everything is over.

and Deepthunk reply...............Actually there's a mountain of evidence............

Further down on the same page Nonpareil write..........Consciousness is the result of physical processes.

but Nonpareil is not happy with this statement which is not based on pure evidence so he goes on with more unsubstantiated statements such as this.........And science is, by definition, capable of investigating anything that exists..........

By this statement Nonpareil include the consciousness but where is the evidence that something physical such as the physical science can investigate something that is not physical?

You see Pablo how much bullshit?
And i just choose a page at random.
Just imagine how much more bullshit there is in the hundreds of thread in this forum.
Thousand and thousand of unsubstantiated statements.
Just a pile of bulls all over the forum and none single critique from atheists to challenge these unsubstantiated claims.