RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 29, 2015 at 12:54 pm
(This post was last modified: October 29, 2015 at 12:55 pm by Whateverist.)
(October 29, 2015 at 8:37 am)Little Rik Wrote:(October 29, 2015 at 12:13 am)Whateverist the White Wrote: This thread has been around so long there is really no way to know whether one has already shared a 'new' response.
So any way I think I agree with the thread's title. Atheism, in my case at least, is entirely unscientific. My non-belief in gods is not the result of any scientific considerations. Science doesn't enter into it. God, as a field of study, has not progressed even to the point of having well defined terms. There may be data pertaining to gods or there may not be. It all depends on what a god is and what would count as evidence for one.
For me silly stuff that no one can point to doesn't rise to the level anything deserving my immediate attention. Gods go in the same round file of non-urgent, non-important drivel as other mythical, fanciful or fictional source materials.
May i ask you what field of study you think God should be studied?
Do you mean with physical science or something else?
Oh intuitional science, of course.
Why study the car when you can study the driver?
