(October 30, 2015 at 11:30 am)alpha male Wrote:(October 30, 2015 at 11:27 am)Rhondazvous Wrote: Notice when he ate the fruit there was no wrestling with his conscience. No acting against his better judgment. he had none. Where is the justice in god holding him responsible for exercising a conscience which he did not have?
If they had no means of judgment, how is it that one of them was deceived, but the other wasn't?
If Adam already knew about right and wrong, why was he tempted to eat the fruit that would give him what he already had?
Nobody pays any attention to Paul. The verse you are talking about where he forbids women to teach in Church Today's Christian woman has worked out a way around that.
The god who allows children to be raped out of respect for the free will choice of the rapist, but punishes gay men for engaging in mutually consensual sex couldn't possibly be responsible for an intelligently designed universe.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire
Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire
Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.
