(October 31, 2015 at 9:32 am)Little Rik Wrote: Oh, Cato, an intellectual like you that waste his time with a low caste like me.
What a waste Cato.
But please Cato considering that you just back up the Nutter would you please produce evidence that
the believers are all f...ed up in the head?
Have you got solid evidence that God does not exist therefore the believers are f...ed in the head?
Please Cato help Little Rik to understand.
All believers have is the baseless assertions of ignorant ancients. Absence of evidence is evidence of absence where it is reasonable to expect evidence. We have five senses with which to experience existence and even when we extend the powers of the same with technology, not a single trace of any proposed god can be found. Quite strange for something so powerful that is often said to constantly meddle in our affairs. The reasonable conclusion is 'no god'.
This fact immediately renders all gods described by mythology as non-existent. The best a god-bother could hope for at this point is Spinoza's god, with is simply a relabeling of nature and rather silly or a deist creator god that promptly fucked off after setting things in motion. Not much to discuss with these two characters and again there isn't even evidence for these. Be honest though, these definitions of god are not what most are conjuring up when they prattle on about their personal relationships with deities based on stories in sacred texts.
Belief in god is unjustified. People can continue to believe all they want, it's their prerogative, but until they produce a god it's simply fantasy. The expectation that others share the belief is unrealistic.
