RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
October 31, 2015 at 6:42 pm
(This post was last modified: October 31, 2015 at 6:44 pm by TheRocketSurgeon.)
(October 31, 2015 at 6:34 pm)jenny1972 Wrote:(October 31, 2015 at 6:09 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: According to Jenny's logic, autopsies are useless because the coroner wasn't present at the death.
the coroner has the body and can actually study it
Okay now I KNOW she's fucking with us. Either not one thing I said above got through, or this is on purpose.
Either way...
Done.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.