Young Earth Creationism Vs. Science (Statler Waldorf Contd)

[Captain Scarlet]

I've missed some of this back-and-forth, what have the Pyramids got to do with anything? And more importantly why is that a prerequisite for you giving an argument for the existence of God?

I can't show that that the Pyramids were necessarily built by humans, the only sort of argument would be as follows:

1. The pyramids are stone buildings.
2. These pyramids could have been built by an ancient culture.
3. There is an ancient culture that claims credit for the buildings (the Egyptians).
4. There exists no evidence of intervention from any other cultures or beings, Therefore:
5. The only justified conclusion is that the pyramids were built by the ancient Egyptians.

I'm not sure how solid it is seeing as it was off the top of my head but it seems at first glance to be sound and valid. If it is possible for P to be built by x, x claims credit for P and there is no evidence for participation from any non-x entity in the creation of P then only justified conclusion is that x built P.

Don't humour him Void. He has asserted supernatural creation is true and when asked for evidence and argument FOR supernatural creation rather than evidence AGAINST evolution (which are just the usual rants from creationists), he then says he won't provide evidence/argument until someone proves the pyramids were built by humans. Its just beyond contempt. He's holding an empty sack and erecting strawmen to protect his position. Yawn.