RE: Why the "There are so many interpretations of the Bible" claim is confused
November 1, 2015 at 1:38 am
(This post was last modified: November 1, 2015 at 1:39 am by robvalue.)
Logical arguments are not evidence. They are only as true as their initial assumptions.
Textual accounts are evidence, just woefully insufficient evidence for a sceptic regarding the claims that are normally made.
Anecdotal accounts are also evidence, but again insufficient to a sceptic.
Unexplained phenomena are not evidence. They are simply unexplained.
Textual accounts are evidence, just woefully insufficient evidence for a sceptic regarding the claims that are normally made.
Anecdotal accounts are also evidence, but again insufficient to a sceptic.
Unexplained phenomena are not evidence. They are simply unexplained.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum