RE: Young Earth Creationism Vs. Science (Statler Waldorf Contd)
December 16, 2010 at 4:37 pm
(This post was last modified: December 16, 2010 at 4:42 pm by Statler Waldorf.)
(December 16, 2010 at 3:42 pm)Chuck Wrote: [quote='rjh4' pid='110339' dateline='1292523401']
If you look around your medicine cabinate, the computer you type on, the car you drive, the plane you flew in, and the answer to what you ask is still not clear to you, then you are too stupid to ever enjoy real clarity. The bible is probably the best pretense at clarity that will ever be in your limited reach. So go back to it for you have no alternatives.
Huh? If the answer is so obvious as you claim it is, then why do you seem to have such a difficult time explaining it? I think his question stands un-answered.
(December 16, 2010 at 1:16 pm)Chuck Wrote: Creationism predicted that creationists will be morons. Statler is therefore strong evidence FOR creationism.
No wait, In this case, other systems makes exactly the same prediction as creationism. So I guess even Statler doesn't count as evidence FOR creationism.
Sorry, Statler. Your creationism is just screwed.
Haha, here we are having all of these great conversations, and intellectually intriguing discussions and the best you can contribute is this? You really are small time.
