RE: Young Earth Creationism Vs. Science (Statler Waldorf Contd)
December 16, 2010 at 5:39 pm
(This post was last modified: December 16, 2010 at 5:44 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(December 16, 2010 at 4:57 pm)rjh4 Wrote: What you said clearly touches on the "and get results" part, but if fails to address the main part of what I was getting at. I was wondering how scientific/methodological naturalism could be used to establish the truthfulness of a claim that scientific/methodological naturalism is the single most effective epistimology for establishing truth claims, which is, essentially, what Void was claiming. So, Chuck, maybe you can address my real point.
Name a competitor and we shall examine the relative efficacy.
If you are unable to come up with a another epistimology capable of not just claiming, but demonstrating in the sense normally understood, equal efficacy in establishing the truthfulness of a claim, then you have no respectable grounds to challenge his claim.